Black vs. nigger

First, let me say that, if you are easily offended, do me a favor, go read someone else’s stuff because you will not like this. I don’t apologize for anything, this issue lies with you, and i honestly hope you can someday rise above it. It is making you a weaker more vulnerable person, and i don’t want that for you. You’ve been told to react whenever someone uses the word nigger…unless it’s two urban youths who happen to BE black, then somehow it’s ok. If it’s a rapper, and he changes the word to niggA, somehow that’s also ok. Let me ask, what the hell is wrong with you?

To fully understand this written piece, you should consider all sides of the context. On the one hand, i’m discussing the word nigger and the way it’s been bastardized to describe the value of a person, which is incorrect, inaccurate…on the other hand, i’m using it as it was originally intended, which is to describe someone’s complexion. There is a third, almost subliminal context, which is that this is a state of mind, a way of being. Many black people, enjoy being as ‘ black ‘ ( using this as an adjective ) as possible. Normally this would be the best, most proud thing you could ever do. Only, to some, regarding their interpretation of this word, it injects bold ignorance and a sense of being owed something by the world. Claiming the oppression of their ancestors as their own. Nothing wrong with that, if it is accurate. It isn’t accurate. They are reacting to oppression that didn’t happen the way they think it did. So they are misinformed about their own history, we all are for the most part. Ask the next black person you meet if their ancestors were enslaved in America. If they say yes, ask them when. Do they know, when? Are they assuming that their ancestors were the only ones who were enslaved here? Do they know that the Spaniards were the ones who brought them to this continent? Do they understand that this was sporadic, and they weren’t forced to stay here, until after the settlers/colonists had arrived?

Do they understand that ‘ post-settler/colonist America ‘ was still under the constructs of the Crown of England, for roughly two more centuries after they got here? For that matter are they aware that, this new exodus of anarchists and free thinkers, were allowed to ‘ escape ‘ to this continent, under the guise of citizens denying the constraints of religious England and all her imposition, when in reality, this was part of a larger plan to expand British rule into this area? Besides, if you really think about it, the settlers adapted the same religious tyranny, and extended it to their own. How is this a change? What’s worse, they tried to liberate the indigenous tribes into Christianity. These new settlers were just as racist, to use the word properly, not that anyone does anymore…as anyone in England or China, anywhere else.

Do they understand that Britain, did more to impose torture, suffering on their ancestors than any new American ever did? Do they know the history of their homeland Africa, regarding British rule and tyranny? Britain still owned parts of Africa until 1964. Do they know that the ‘ Mulatto ‘ race was in fact outright created by rich cunts in Britain, who would force black slaves to have sex and impregnate little Irish girls, age 9-12, thus creating the complexion to be mixed? Who are they truly mad at? Do they know that their ancestors were on those plantations, after, the Irish were there? Do they know that the Irish were considered to be of a lesser value than the blacks were? So, going on the value side of this equation, Irish were the true niggers, were they not? There are so many questions i could list here…some of these questions, if addressed, would surely change the thinking of many black people today, who have been indoctrinated to believe all the hype behind white-racist propaganda. Meaning that for centuries, ‘ white ‘ America has been responsible for painting a certain bleak portrait of their oppression to shape it a certain way. Why? To persuade them that white people are bad, evil, slave-owners, nothing more. How many black children grow up believing this propaganda? To take this even further, on a sociological scale, how do they learn of all this hatred and tension? Their parents, teachers, peers, inform them of the racial tension and the oppression over the centuries. This is indoctrination. Who tells them this wrong information? This is the same as spreading a lie. However innocent it might be. Isn’t every child, no matter their ‘ color ‘ supposed to come into this existence, a clean slate? Who is it that writes in red chalk, all the hatred and bitterness, which they will later come to know as their history? I do wish that i could blame it on a bunch of old racist white guys in the South, from several hundred years ago…but i can’t. This issue lies with our own systems of learning and our way of spreading untruths, in order to have a status quo, however insidious it may be.

Some black men, such as Samir Shabazz, have taken it upon themselves to reinforce all of the hatred and contempt against white people, which has been erased for so many years. It seems that for the most part racism had gone away, at least on the surface…but people like him have brought it back full strength. He portrays the typical, mad at everyone, black man…but he enjoys being this third subliminal interpretation of a nigger. Why? What is his interpretation of what it means to be one? Why is he ok with being labeled one? Why does he have such a hatred for white people? Does he know his own actual history, or did he learn the falsified manipulated history which has been spread? Does he understand that black people were not the first ones on those plantations in New America? To clarify, blacks from Africa and abroad were indeed, brought to this continent after 1492, but as far as the settlers owning slaves, that didn’t happen until later. He has NO claim to that at all. The Irish slaves were there long before any blacks were, so there is that. Why is he mad again? Can you refresh our memory, Samir? Is he even aware that the first slave owner in America, was a black man named Anthony Johnson? He had black slaves…

Now, to the issue of crime in America today.

It’s not racist to say, black people are the problem, they cause most of the crimes in America. It’s just inaccurate, because it isn’t all of them. There are plenty of hard-working well educated black people who want nothing to do with the hate and violence, that their counterparts seem to love. How can they deny it when it surrounds them. Black people make up around 13% of the population in the US, yet they commit around 53% of the crimes.

What is racist, is to BE black and to not admit that your own people are making this happen. What is racist is to be white and not admit that some blacks are violent and very dangerous, because you will be seen as a racist if you do. Stop being a pussy. These certain blacks have an innate need to commit these crimes. They don’t mind jail, they will get off because of their color in most cases anyway. It should come down to pride. Are you proud to be black? You should be. Are you proud that you can go out and stab an old woman and grab her purse, leave her to die, and in court you will automatically be seen as the victim to some extent only because of your ‘ color ‘? Is that not being a racist?

Are Oprah, Obama, Sharpton, any of the other ridiculous race-baiters, really more happy in a white-oriented and driven society? Sure seems that way. Is that not racist? When celebrities bleach their skin to become a lighter shade of black so they are accepted, is that not racist? They are telling us that they acknowledge white as best.

Black people have already lost the battle if they are ok with being labeled, ‘ black ‘ …( yes, you’re correct, i’ve used the words black and white throughout…there’s a reason, explained further on. )

Also, i have to echo the statements and sentiments of the brilliant, and very misunderstood, David Duke, when i say that our media has jaded people, making it so they’re so used to hearing propaganda, not the true facts, they can’t recognize the lies that are being told.

We hear newscasters saying, ‘ the African-American man was chased for 2 blocks by the white police officers…’ …
why the divide? They didn’t say the black man, the Caucasian cops. They didn’t say, the African-American, the Caucasian cops…they said, African-American, white. Why? Because there has to be a divide, and a politically correct one at that. Although, as you see it favors the black side of that political correctness, while at the same time degrading it. Otherwise there would be no silent propaganda, mind manipulation on a subliminal scale. Think about that. Why bring color into it at all? The newscaster could have easily said the suspect was chased by the officers…

To get back to my parentheses, i used black and white because that’s what you are used to hearing. Why are you used to it? Propaganda, through the media, advertising, all of it points us to say and do things a certain way. Especially now, when black people call each other nigga, which is really nigger…why? Why would they? These days people don’t write out the word ‘ black ‘ they spell it Bl-ck…WHY???
People are so afraid of being labeled a racist, they are now afraid to spell!! Did the letter A become some c-t-lyst in – c-mp-ign of H-TE?? Vowels are on the way out apparently…and if you had a hard time understanding the sentence without the As included, that only furthers my point.

Call it for what it is. If blacks want to call each other nigger, i guess we don’t need to worry about it so much huh? Now the word has become one of many adjectives…

African-American is the black man who is so ‘ black ‘ he’s everything African and culturally sound. Then nigger is the man who sells drugs to kids and would stab his Mom in the throat for 100 bucks. Which is correct?
So, why say, ” the African-American robbed an old lady, stabbed her, then proceeded to rape her for 5 hours before leaving her to die…” …did that really pretty up the broadcast at all? What you’ve done is make it a bit more bearable to the ears and minds of the listeners, by easing up on the word black. How is that right? Who are you protecting?

Call it for what it is.

The niggers did that to the old lady…the African-Americans were at home reading, or at school trying to improve themselves.

I have a friend, who always calls me out for using the ‘ N-word ‘ …sorry but it’s called nigger, everyone else should be saying it too. She tells me, i shouldn’t say things like, there’s a difference between blacks and niggers. My response is, so, you are saying there is no difference between blacks and niggers? That would mean every black person is a nigger, and i’m not saying that, you are by not dividing them. Clearly, a well educated black person wouldn’t rob a store and stab someone just to do it. A nigger would. A black person wouldn’t shoot someone and steal their sneakers…a nigger would.

Do i need to go on?

What has changed? Today people are too afraid to say words, out of fear of what others will think or say to them. Well, guess what? This is part of the problem, not a solution. If they can’t handle it, too bad. I was raised to believe that honesty is the best policy. Some of the ones who told me that, don’t want to hear the truth, because they are embarrassed…not my problem.

Black people always tout the typical reason for their discontent with whitey…and it usually points back to all the oppression their ancestors, not them, had to deal with. I get it, they are correct, but the word nigger is not to describe someone of a lesser value, in any way. It has been bastardized to be so, but the original intent was to describe complexion. Black people, and people with a dark complexion were called nigger for their color, not their value. The Irish slaves in America, were of lesser value than their black brethren who came later on…so, by the current unintelligible logic, those Irish slaves were the first niggers…if you are attaching the value side of the word, in all of it’s injurious intent, and context.

So if they are calling each other nigger because of their skin color, it is correct. However, i can’t seem to name any of them who have brought that up in discussions, or in the media, not once. Besides, slavery still exists today, and not all slaves are black, in fact, none of them are exclusively black, slavery knows no color. Slave labor, child slavery…for what?
This is the year 2016 and slavery is still alive and well. There are children in third world countries, who are being exploited right now! While you drink your Pepsi products and show off your nice diamond ring…who was mining the caves, collecting those diamonds? Who was out in the fields, gathering palm oil so you could have your well off life? Children.
Child slavery. Or should i be politically correct? and say, potential youth indentured servantry…

Black, White, Red, Yellow…

Are humans here to be relegated to bits of some broken rainbow before we can comprehend each other?

afec593a1ad6f3dd37f112e00eaf7e31

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s